The
Sand Creek Experience
I have
always had a deep fascination with “The Old West”. As a history
geek, I read about it all through my childhood. As a young man, I
participated with a gunslinger group doing cowboy cinematic style
shootouts across Oklahoma. I still enjoy reading and discovering new
places in the Old West. One aspect of the Old West experience that I
have found most interesting, and powerful, is the Plains Indian Wars.
During
the Civil War, western expansion encountered the people and tribes of
Plains. These included the Cheyenne, Arapaho, Souix, and many other
cultures. They traveled from what would be the Dakotas and Montana in
the North to Texas and Oklahoma in the South. As more people moved
from the East into the Plains, they began to settle on lands that the
tribes who traveled across those lands used for hunting and seasonal
habitations. This led to conflict that was sometimes violent.
Territorial
and elected governors, expressing concern over “protecting
settlers”, asked for Federal troops to be sent to their regions. In
many cases, these soldiers were stationed in camps or forts around
the undeveloped areas that accounted for much of the frontier. In
many cases, troops were not able to be on hand when settlers were
accosted or attacked. When reports came out, there were few details
about who was involved or how many. This resulted in parties of
soldiers being sent out in retaliation. According to reports
submitted by soldiers, there was some reclamation of property or
reclaiming of persons taken in raids.
Tensions
increased among the different “sides” that had a voice in the
affairs of the region. Settlers and communities desired increased
patrols to feel at peace. Tribes desired access to lands that they
had long used to survive. Politicians desired to keep their
constituents pacified. Tribal leaders were torn between those
desiring to make and keep peace with the new “neighbors” and
those who desired keeping what they had by force. In many cases, the
tension that was growing led to increased violence.
There
are many places that are marked by violence in the war that continued
throughout the second half of the 19th Century. I have
personally visited 3 of those places. The most famous, the Little
Bighorn battle in Montana has gained notoriety as Custer's Last
Stand. The Battle of the Washita, right outside Cheyenne, Oklahoma,
was George Custer's first “successful” campaign against an Indian
encampment. And Sand Creek in Southeastern Colorado. All three sites
have deepened my interest in the campaigns between the indigenous
people of the Plains and western expansionist settlers.
The
most recent, the Sand Creek Massacre National Historic Site, has a
dual point of interest for me. The history of the United Methodist
Church intersects with the Plains War in a very real way at Sand
Creek. The territorial governor of Colorado, John Evans, was a lay
leader in hist Methodist Episcopal Church congregation. The commander
of a group of Colorado volunteer troops, Colonel John Chivington, was
a former Methodist Episcopal Church ordained clergy. Evans and
Chivington were in agreement on an effort to exterminate certain
Indian groups. Evans gave Chivington authority to use troops to kill
any Indian groups who were not “under protection”.
The
brief history of the Sand Creek Massacre involved Evans meeting with
chiefs who lived in Eastern Colorado and giving them a verbal
assurance of protection if they stayed within a protective envelope
around established military forts or camps. When those chiefs
returned to the fort near their camps, they were given temporary
shelter, but were told by the commander to return to a camping site
near the fort, but outside of the envelope. Chivington took his
troops into Southeastern Colorado looking for a fight. When he
arrived at the fort, he obtained command of the regular troops
assigned to the fort. It was clear to the soldiers at the fort that
Chivington was seeking out the same tribes represented at the meeting
with Evans. He was determined to attack their encampment.
After
commandeering the fort's complement of soldiers and artillery,
Chivington leads the troop to the encampment. He uses the relatively
untrained volunteers to separate the horses from the tribe, to
prevent their easy escape. He sends regular, experienced soldiers
through the camp to put the people to running. He assigned the
artillery to shell the only escape route they had. As the women and
children ran toward the only escape, the men attempted to delay the
soldiers. The untrained volunteers broke from scattering the horses
to concentrate on the fleeing women and children. In the 8 hours that
followed, between 150 and 200 Indians were killed, two thirds of whom
were women and children.
The
early reports submitted by Chivington described a battle with few
casualties among women and children. But unofficial letters between
resistant officers to an officer who was not involved led to a
military tribunal and two congressional hearings over the events. The
result of all three proceedings was that this was not a military
campaign. This was a massacre that should have never happened.
Tomorrow I will offer some contemporary reflection on the visit.
Comments